PAC-Bayes and Domain Adaptation

We provide two main contributions in PAC-Bayesian theory for domain adaptation where the objective is to learn, from a source distribution, a well-performing majority vote on a different, but related, target distribution. Firstly, we propose an improvement of the previous approach we proposed in Germain et al. (2013), which relies on a novel distribution pseudodistance based on a disagreement averaging, allowing us to derive a new tighter domain adaptation bound for the target risk. While this bound stands in the spirit of common domain adaptation works, we derive a second bound (introduced in Germain et al., 2016) that brings a new perspective on domain adaptation by deriving an upper bound on the target risk where the distributions' divergence-expressed as a ratio-controls the trade-off between a source error measure and the target voters' disagreement. We discuss and compare both results, from which we obtain PAC-Bayesian generalization bounds. Furthermore, from the PAC-Bayesian specialization to linear classifiers, we infer two learning algorithms, and we evaluate them on real data.Comment: Neurocomputing, Elsevier, 2019. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1503.0694

A New PAC-Bayesian Perspective on Domain Adaptation

We study the issue of PAC-Bayesian domain adaptation: We want to learn, from a source domain, a majority vote model dedicated to a target one. Our theoretical contribution brings a new perspective by deriving an upper-bound on the target risk where the distributions' divergence---expressed as a ratio---controls the trade-off between a source error measure and the target voters' disagreement. Our bound suggests that one has to focus on regions where the source data is informative.From this result, we derive a PAC-Bayesian generalization bound, and specialize it to linear classifiers. Then, we infer a learning algorithmand perform experiments on real data.Comment: Published at ICML 201

An Improvement to the Domain Adaptation Bound in a PAC-Bayesian context

This paper provides a theoretical analysis of domain adaptation based on the PAC-Bayesian theory. We propose an improvement of the previous domain adaptation bound obtained by Germain et al. in two ways. We first give another generalization bound tighter and easier to interpret. Moreover, we provide a new analysis of the constant term appearing in the bound that can be of high interest for developing new algorithmic solutions.Comment: NIPS 2014 Workshop on Transfer and Multi-task learning: Theory Meets Practice, Dec 2014, Montr{\'e}al, Canad

PAC-Bayesian Learning and Domain Adaptation

In machine learning, Domain Adaptation (DA) arises when the distribution gen- erating the test (target) data differs from the one generating the learning (source) data. It is well known that DA is an hard task even under strong assumptions, among which the covariate-shift where the source and target distributions diverge only in their marginals, i.e. they have the same labeling function. Another popular approach is to consider an hypothesis class that moves closer the two distributions while implying a low-error for both tasks. This is a VC-dim approach that restricts the complexity of an hypothesis class in order to get good generalization. Instead, we propose a PAC-Bayesian approach that seeks for suitable weights to be given to each hypothesis in order to build a majority vote. We prove a new DA bound in the PAC-Bayesian context. This leads us to design the first DA-PAC-Bayesian algorithm based on the minimization of the proposed bound. Doing so, we seek for a \rho-weighted majority vote that takes into account a trade-off between three quantities. The first two quantities being, as usual in the PAC-Bayesian approach, (a) the complexity of the majority vote (measured by a Kullback-Leibler divergence) and (b) its empirical risk (measured by the \rho-average errors on the source sample). The third quantity is (c) the capacity of the majority vote to distinguish some structural difference between the source and target samples.Comment: https://sites.google.com/site/multitradeoffs2012

PAC-Bayesian Theory Meets Bayesian Inference

We exhibit a strong link between frequentist PAC-Bayesian risk bounds and the Bayesian marginal likelihood. That is, for the negative log-likelihood loss function, we show that the minimization of PAC-Bayesian generalization risk bounds maximizes the Bayesian marginal likelihood. This provides an alternative explanation to the Bayesian Occam's razor criteria, under the assumption that the data is generated by an i.i.d distribution. Moreover, as the negative log-likelihood is an unbounded loss function, we motivate and propose a PAC-Bayesian theorem tailored for the sub-gamma loss family, and we show that our approach is sound on classical Bayesian linear regression tasks.Comment: Published at NIPS 2015 (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/6569-pac-bayesian-theory-meets-bayesian-inference

A Greedy Algorithm for Building Compact Binary Activated Neural Networks

We study binary activated neural networks in the context of regression tasks, provide guarantees on the expressiveness of these particular networks and propose a greedy algorithm for building such networks. Aiming for predictors having small resources needs, the greedy approach does not need to fix in advance an architecture for the network: this one is built one layer at a time, one neuron at a time, leading to predictors that aren't needlessly wide and deep for a given task. Similarly to boosting algorithms, our approach guarantees a training loss reduction every time a neuron is added to a layer. This greatly differs from most binary activated neural networks training schemes that rely on stochastic gradient descent (circumventing the 0-almost-everywhere derivative problem of the binary activation function by surrogates such as the straight through estimator or continuous binarization). We show that our method provides compact and sparse predictors while obtaining similar performances to state-of-the-art methods for training binary activated networks

Discovering Linear Models of Grid Workload

Despite extensive research focused on enabling QoS for grid users through economic and intelligent resource provisioning, no consensus has emerged on the most promising strategies. On top of intrinsically challenging problems, the complexity and size of data has so far drastically limited the number of comparative experiments. An alternative to experimenting on real, large, and complex data, is to look for well-founded and parsimonious representations. The goal of this paper is to answer a set of preliminary questions, which may help steering the design of those along feasible paths: is it possible to exhibit consistent models of the grid workload? If such models do exist, which classes of models are more appropriate, considering both simplicity and descriptive power? How can we actually discover such models? And finally, how can we assess the quality of these models on a statistically rigorous basis? Our main contributions are twofold. First we found that grid workload models can consistently be discovered from the real data, and that limiting the range of models to piecewise linear time series models is sufficiently powerful. Second, we presents a bootstrapping strategy for building more robust models from the limited samples at hand. This study is based on exhaustive information representative of a significant fraction of e-science computing activity in Europe